Friday, November 26, 2010

THE PUBLIC MANDATE: RAISING CONSERVATISM, REJECTING PROGRESSIVE SOCIALISM



In Alexis de Tocqueville’s classic treatise Democracy In America he analyzed why the republican representative democracy has succeeded in the United States, while failing in France. However Tocqueville warned against America’s potential for its democratic-republic to morph into a “soft” despotic democracy organized through a hulking centralized government led by narcissistic leaders legislating a self-aggrandizing agenda.


Tocqueville expressed his caution by writing, 
“…all the able and ambitious members of a democratic community will labor unceasingly to extend the powers of government, because they all hope at some time or other to wield those powers themselves. It would be a waste of time to attempt to prove to them that extreme centralization may be injurious to the state, since they are centralizing it for their own benefit.”

Tocqueville’s warning to America was ignored throughout much of the 20th and 21st centuries, as America permitted instruments of the progressive/socialist movement to infiltrate its system of government. This faction of legislators, jurists and interest groups strived tirelessly to undermine the canons of the American constitution and traditions by way of a leviathan-centralized government. Their authoritarian agenda, bordering on despotism, and faux beneficence to convert America into a social democratic welfare state is aligned with their collectivist worldview to perfect man. Social democracies, as Russell Kirk aptly described in his 1953 opus on the genealogy of the conservative movement The Conservative Mind, “does not so much choke freedom as it simply ignores freedom”.

In the Heritage Foundation editorial entitled , “Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: What Tocqueville Teaches Today”, Paul Rahe of Hillsdale College quotes Tocqueville’s ominous description of the aim and end game of the progressive/socialists mandate to shape and control lives,

“[The sovereign] extends its arms about society as a whole. It covers its surface with a network of petty regulations--complicated, minute, and uniform--through which even the most original minds and the most vigorous souls know not how to make their way past the crowd and emerge into the light of day. It does not break wills; it softens them, bends them and directs them. Rarely does it force one to act but it constantly opposes itself to one's acting on one's own. It does not destroy, it prevents things from being born, it extinguishes, it stupefies and finally, it will reduce each nation to nothing more than a herd of timid, and industrious animals of which the government is the shepherd.”

The progressive/socialist’s desire to convert America into a collectivist state is fueled by their insatiable appetite for tyrannical power, a “second providence”, if you will. Power to control the lives of the masses, and engineered through a gluttonous centralized government configured to homogenize man and excise individual passions and particularism. Tocqueville recognized the personality of the collectivist in Democracy in America by writing, “The pleasure it procures them of interfering with everyone and holding everything in their hands atones to them for its dangers”.

Through their efforts toward greater centralized government and power hungry efforts to “perfect” or level society, progressive/socialists have labored to obliterate the natural diversity that defines man and ignore man’s innate right to a full expression of his talents, freedoms and liberties. They desire to secularize and standardize America while endeavoring to undermine traditional American values, grounded in economic progress and safety, individual initiative and responsibility, moral order and the recognition and acceptance of the distinctiveness of man. Tocqueville’s quote in Democracy in America is prescient when he wrote,

“The very next notion to that of a single and central power which presents itself to the minds of men in the ages of equality is the notion of uniformity of legislation.As every man sees that he differs but little from those about him, he cannot understand why a rule that is applicable to one man should not be applicable to all others. Hence the slightest privileges are repugnant to his reason; the faintest dissimilarities in the political institutions of the same people offend him, and uniformity of legislation appears to him to be the first condition of good government.”

In order to finance their agenda progressive/socialists needed to enact a constitutional amendment allowing them the right to confiscate citizen’s earnings. They elbowed their bellies to the federal government cash bar parasitically appropriating the fruits of American capitalism through the passage of the 16th amendment, authorizing Congress for the first time to levy an income tax. Woodrow Wilson, the presidential father of progressive/socialists, then guided the first income tax act through legislation, the Revenue Act of 1913. To quote William Anderson from his The Legacy of Progressivism”,

“The imposition of the income tax was a green light for unbridled growth of the central government by allowing politicians to confiscate willy-nilly the property of individuals — and especially the property of the most productive citizens.

Having the necessary funds, progressive/socialists over the last two centuries quickly cobbled an unfettered centralized government structured to hobble American individuality, freedoms, liberties, progress and exceptionalism funded by the sweat of American labor and enterprises. They arrogantly marched toward a world vision of egalitarian collectivism with their mission of “hoping to change” America into a mass of secular mediocrity and economic malaise, thwarting individuality, redistributing wealth, disregarding the will of the people and dismissing any notion of historic American exceptionalism. To wit, to create a society of victimhood and entitlement rooted in a faux beneficence. Hence, the famous quote attributed to Alexander Fraser Tytler, "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the people discover they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury."

The resultant upshot of the progressive/socialist legacy is carnage of mounting federal debt brinking on economic collapse, multi-trillion dollar entitlement programs, choking bureaucratic regulations suppressing business expansion, disregard for the constitutional principles of federalism, disdain for American sovereignty, weakened military resources, anemic foreign policies and a secular progressive derision of moral order.

The most egregious influence of progressive socialism on America is their advancement of a dependent civil society-- a classless, victim-based servile society that flouts man’s particularism and ingenuity, granting unconstitutional power to a few to determine the destiny of many. Walter Lippman, a contrite Progressive, stated as much when he said, “...nearly everywhere, the mark of a progressive is that he relies at last upon an increased power of officials to improve the condition of men”.

The progressive/socialist mission hit critical mass in the 2008 presidential election and Tocqueville’s predictive dangers of governmental consolidation tributaried in the names of the Obama, Pelosi and Reid regime. Congruent with the progressive/socialist’s fatally flawed instincts for impetuous social engineering and disregard for man’s uniqueness, American traditions and prudent thought, the Obama regime expedited through the progressive socialist democratic congress pernicious legislative changes that upended constitutional principles and congressional protocol, in the manner of backroom deals, midnight closed door meetings and kickbacks. This regime’s legislative motto is “pass it, then read it” and ignores prudent legislative deliberation aligned to constitutional principles to satisfy an irresponsible and expeditious progressive/socialist agenda.

This regime’s confluence of legislative efforts and philosophy are classically representative of the progressive socialist’s arrogant aura of superiority and indifference to rights inherent in the constitution and the particularism of man. They incredulously praise the litany of their repertoire of voluminous legislation as hallmarks of their regime. A body of work singularly designed to dismantle the political, social and economic fabric of America aligned with their regard for America as an unexceptional nation, which the Obama regime, in all its wisdom, will “perfect”. And at what price? The cost is dear--disregard for the will of the people, the principles of the constitution, individuality, introspection, prudence, historical prescription and generational economic ruin.


“Soft Despotism, Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect” by Paul Rahe describes America’s crisis of progressive/socialist’s effort to continue a burgeoning centralized government as the “French disease”. An asymptomatic disease that Tocqueville feared for his native France that has now infected America and saps them of their sense of particularism, individuality and freedoms. Rahe states 


“...to an ever-increasing degree, our compatriots are subject to what Tocqueville described as "an immense tutelary power which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate." As he predicted, this power is "absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident and gentle," and it "works willingly for their happiness, it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances." It is entirely proper to ask whether it can "relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living," for such is evidently its aim."

In the wake of the 2010 mid-term election, Americans overwhelmingly repudiated the polices of the Obama regime with the GOP winning a net gain of over sixty additional seats in the House of Representatives, the largest gain for one party since 1948, and at least six in the Senate. Despite the elections historic and irrefutable rebuke of the Obama regime, one’s imagination is tested upon hearing President Obama and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi continue to defend their legacies. Pelosi continues her power grab and was named House Minority leader despite her utterly failed leadership, tremendously low public approval ratings and leading her party to the most historic drubbing in the House of Representatives since 1922. And what was President Obama’s response to his mid-term “shellacking”? "It's a matter of persuading people. And giving them confidence and bringing them together. And setting a tone. And making an argument that people can understand."

A characteristic response in the parlance of the progressive/socialist. The imperfections of the American public failed to appreciate his omnipotence, however they did appreciate the pain his policies inflicted on them. Only progressive/socialist haughtiness or blind allegiance to their ideology can explain this remarkable squall of denial from these two ideologists.

This response is symptomatic of the progressive/socialist’s arrogant personality, character and utopian ideology. One which ignores thoughtfulness, prudence, prescription, constitutional principles and historical perspective. A blindly naïve, utopian and supercilious mindset that “knows best” and constantly endeavors to recklessly transform civil society’s landscape in their relentless pursuit to “perfect” and level man towards a classless, dependent, despotic social democratic welfare state. An egalitarian society purviewed by their self-imposed ruling class in the cockpit of a goliath, centralized government, all the while negating any respect for individual liberties, freedoms and the need for economic progress. Tocqueville sagaciously foresaw a regime such as Obama’s, one which is the zenith of an American social democratic welfare state, when he wrote, 


“I am of the opinion that, in the democratic ages which are opening upon us, the individual independence and local liberties will ever be the products of art; that centralization will be the natural government”.

With this goal in mind, the scope of the Obama regime’s progressive/socialist legislative record is eerily unprecedented in post-modern times and under this regime Tocqueville’s harbinger of the dangers of a democracy’s overbloated centralized government reached its apex. Debt and deficit laden entitlement-based multi-trillion dollar stimulus spending and ObamaCare legislation, cloaked in the message of preserving the economy and reducing health care costs, were legislated into law to advance their ideals of collectivism and “social justice”. Corporate takeovers, bailouts, executive compensation and financial industry “reform” masked by disingenuous messages of “saving” jobs and fostering employment, which never materialized, were enacted to control industrial means of production and negate Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” of the free-enterprise system. The Obama regime stirred unparalled national and state infighting with ObamaCare and the DoJ lawsuit against Arizona’s illegal immigration law to protect state sovereignty. The former propelled 20 states to sue the federal government over the constitutionality of ObamaCare, the latter prompting California and Arizona business boycotts. For both issues, the Obama regime circumvented and ignored the principles of federalism marrowed in the tenth amendment.

As with Tocqueville, conservative America foresaw the disastrous results manifesting from the arrogant, reckless collectivist polices of the Obama regime enabled through an autocratic centralized government. The pattern of disaster is predictable with each generation of rash progressive/socialist agendas, albeit FDRs welfare and social security policies or LBJ’s medicare legislation. As each piece of the Obama regime’s hasty legislative policies was covertly crafted behind closed doors and the backs of the public, a new layer of bureaucracy was pressed into the central government as a means to control, encroach upon and “perfect”, in their eyes, the American people. Within two years burgeoning debt and deficits, economic and industrial uncertainly, massive unemployment, dollar devaluation and constitutional breaches engulfed America.

Conservative prognostications notwithstanding, the American people rose, rallied and railed against this onslaught against conservative principles of society and government. American outrage to the Obama regime galvanized, through the 2010 mid-term elections, a return to the Founder’s conservative principles of limited federal government, a veneration of divine providence, moral order, and respect for tenth amendment federalist principles of state’s rights and the various classes of society.

Such precepts led Tocqueville in his Democracy in America to coin America as exceptional, a term President Obama refuses to attribute to the country he leads. Tocqueville wished that America, a country that holds a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity, derived from a unique balance of public and private interests governed by constitutional ideals that are focused on personal and economic freedom, would be a lesson learned for his native France.

How does the GOP govern America’s 112th Congress towards a return to these precepts, in the face of the Obama regime’s progressive socialist-led soft despotism? In The Conservative Mind Russell Kirk expresses the essence of conservatism as the preservation of the ancient moral traditions of humanity: a respect for the wisdom of our ancestors. According to Kirk, conservatives are “dubious of wholesale alteration and think society is a spiritual reality, possessing an eternal life but a delicate constitution: it cannot be recast as if it were a machine”. Abraham Lincoln responded to conservatism as, “Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?”

Compare Kirk’s essential conservative to the progressive/socialist’s ideological disregard for tradition, the historical forewarnings of tyrannical regimes that recklessly engineer moment-to-moment untested social order through concentrated power, and their penchant for impetuous change: change without forethought, prudence or regard for individualism , freedoms and liberty. The social, political and economic results of the Obama regime are manifested in those progressive socialist ideologies.

As a lighted runway to return to Tocqueville’s view of American exceptionalism, Russell Kirk outlined ten guiding principles for conservatives. These guiding principles should be the bedrock for the GOPs vision of governance in the 112th Congress. They will serve the GOP well as foundations to reinvigorate Tocqueville’s American exceptionalism from the grasp of the soft despotism of the Obama regime.

1. The conservative believes that there exists an enduring moral order. That order is made for man, and man is made for it: human nature is a constant, and moral truths are permanent.

2. The conservative adheres to custom, convention, and continuity. It is old custom that enables people to live together peaceably; the destroyers of custom demolish more than they know or desire. It is through convention—a word much abused in our time—that we contrive to avoid perpetual disputes about rights and duties: law at base is a body of conventions.

3. Conservatives believe in what may be called the principle of prescription. that is, of things established by immemorial usage, so that the mind of man runneth not to the contrary. There exist rights of which the chief sanction is their antiquity—including rights to property, often. Similarly, our morals are prescriptive in great part.

4. Conservatives are guided by their principle of prudence. Edmund Burke agrees with Plato that in the statesman, prudence is chief among virtues. Any public measure ought to be judged by its probable long-run consequences, not merely by temporary advantage or popularity. Liberals and radicals, the conservative says, are imprudent: for they dash at their objectives without giving much heed to the risk of new abuses worse than the evils they hope to sweep away.

5. Conservatives pay attention to the principle of variety. They feel affection for the proliferating intricacy of long-established social institutions and modes of life, as distinguished from the narrowing uniformity and deadening egalitarianism of radical systems. For the preservation of a healthy diversity in any civilization, there must survive orders and classes, differences in material condition, and many sorts of inequality.

6. Conservatives are chastened by their principle of imperfectability. The conservative knows that human nature suffers irremediably from certain grave faults. Man being imperfect, no perfect social order ever can be created. the conservative says: we are not made for perfect things. All that we reasonably can expect is a tolerably ordered, just, and free society, in which some evils, maladjustments, and suffering will continue to lurk. By proper attention to prudent reform, we may preserve and improve this tolerable order. The ideologues who promise the perfection of man and society have converted a great part of the twentieth-century world into a terrestrial hell.

7. Conservatives are persuaded that freedom and property are closely linked. Separate property from private possession, and Leviathan becomes master of all. Upon the foundation of private property, great civilizations are built. The more widespread is the possession of private property, the more stable and productive is a commonwealth. Economic levelling, conservatives maintain, is not economic progress. Getting and spending are not the chief aims of human existence; but a sound economic basis for the person, the family, and the commonwealth is much to be desired.

8. Conservatives uphold voluntary community, quite as they oppose involuntary collectivism. Although Americans have been attached strongly to privacy and private rights, they also have been a people conspicuous for a successful spirit of community. For a nation is no stronger than the numerous little communities of which it is composed. A central administration, or a corps of select managers and civil servants, however well intentioned and well trained, cannot confer justice and prosperity and tranquility upon a mass of men and women deprived of their old responsibilities. That experiment has been made before; and it has been disastrous. It is the performance of our duties in community that teaches us prudence and efficiency and charity.

9. The conservative perceives the need for prudent restraints upon power and upon human passions. Politically speaking, power is the ability to do as one likes, regardless of the wills of one's fellows. A state in which an individual or a small group are able to dominate the wills of their fellows without check is a despotism, whether it is called monarchical or aristocratic or democratic. The conservative endeavors to so limit and balance political power that anarchy or tyranny may not arise. It is characteristic of the radical that he thinks of power as a force for good—so long as the power falls into his hands. Knowing human nature for a mixture of good and evil, the conservative does not put his trust in mere benevolence. Constitutional restrictions, political checks and balances, adequate enforcement of the laws, the old intricate web of restraints upon will and appetite—these the conservative approves as instruments of freedom and order. A just government maintains a healthy tension between the claims of authority and the claims of liberty.

10. The thinking conservative understands that Permanence and change must be recognized and reconciled in a vigorous society. The Permanence of a society is formed by those enduring interests and convictions that gives us stability and continuity; without that Permanence, the fountains of the great deep are broken up, society slipping into anarchy. The Progression in a society is that spirit and that body of talents which urge us on to prudent reform and improvement; without that Progression, a people stagnate. Therefore the intelligent conservative endeavors to reconcile the claims of Permanence and the claims of Progression. He thinks that the liberal and the radical, blind to the just claims of Permanence, would endanger the heritage bequeathed to us, in an endeavor to hurry us into some dubious Terrestrial Paradise. The conservative, in short, favors reasoned and temperate progress; he is opposed to the cult of Progress, whose votaries believe that everything new necessarily is superior to everything old.

It is with ardor and diligence that the GOP led 112th Congress should heed Tocquevilles’ warnings and adhere to these conservative articles. Tocqueville’s soft despotic democracy has enveloped America through the Obama regime’s centralization of power. The public mandate on November 2, 2010 is to reject that regime’s agenda for the obvious reasons. That mandate also directs a raising of American conservatism to the heights that caused Tocqueville to label young America as exceptional when he wrote of its promise in Democracy in America.

After the Constitutional Convention had finished its work in 1787, a woman asked Ben Franklin what kind of government had been decided upon. He replied: "A republic, if you can keep it." The public mandate on November 2, 2010 was clear that Americans are intent on delivering on Mr. Franklin’s challenge. Raising conservatism and rejecting the Obama regimes soft despotism is the means to this end.

With the historic mid-term GOP victories, America sent it’s republic representatives to Congress to ensure that Tocqueville’s exceptional America’s, constructed on its heritage of conservatism, is preserved, reinstated and resurrected. A clear mandate for Alexis de Tocqueville’s vision of America to endure once more.

No comments: